Re: Would this put you off buying fish......
#6
Yes it would put me off, by leaving the fish dead in situ not only are they neglectful and unclean, but actually massively increasing disease transmission issues. Many fish will contract diseases from the flesh of the dead, depending on what killed them. It also shows that fish that are showing signs of illness are not watched, not segregated , not quarantined and not treated appropriately, might also have been subject to intolerably long transit times, and probably not acclimated properly.Its also a good sign of underfeeding, I have a large colection and on the very rare occassion I get a death out of the blue, and havent spotted it being sick days in advance rarely is the corpse eaten by the same species. Most well fed fish don't bother to feed on the flesh of their fallen shoal members. I have herbivores, predators and omnivores alike, and even if I had a fish dead for a couple of days having come back from holiday or something, rarely is the body touched by the others.
I suppose its inevitable they get the odd deader, but to not take them out ASAP, and check for problems in the tank is just plain slovenly. It would read to me as if things are not under control, and that would be enough to prevent me from considering them as a supplier of livestock. Theres no excuse for it.
When I worked in a shop I would check all the fish every few hours, even if we did get a dead fish in the system which was rare because i'd usually have spotted illness days before death, and should a dead one be spotted it would be removed immediately.It isnt nice for the customers, and I might stick a not for sale sticker on if I suspected disease or stress. Fish in a state of fragility should not be for sale because they would have to go through it again when bought.